Self-organization

Evolution The amazing thing about the universe is: it is totally self-organized. Self-organization is a leading principle you will find everywhere in the nature. The evolution doesn't need a leader.

Only mankind seems to be too dumb to make use of this principle. The whole mankind? No, not all of them. Tribes that we dare to call "primitive" are using this - they don't follow a leader (in case of a dispute the council of elders is asked, and only if the quarreller won't agree on a compromise this council has the right to make a decision).

Yes, we think we're so smart, but we aren't. Except... there are a few people out there in our business who use that principle. Of course, when they started, nearly everybody laughed at them. But people have stopped laughing, though they still (occasionally) call their ideas "communistic".
 

Previous chapter

Next chapter

Table of contents

Free Software You know that I'm talking about Richard Stallman and Linus Torvald and others. If you don't know what I'm talking about you should read the following three articles  (or, at least. the second one) from Eric S. Raymond:
The Cathedral and the Bazaar:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar.html
Excellent reading!
Homesteading the Noosphere:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/homesteading.html
This is about motivation!
The Magic Cauldron:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/magic-cauldron/magic-cauldron.html
Especially the article "Homesteading the Noosphere" will tell you something about motivation that isn't as theoretical as my writings. But reading it with my text in mind will let you take a different look at Raymond's sayings - you can see more clearly why he is right.

And "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" will tell you about other ways to create software. "The Magic Cauldron" is about making money with free software (or about free software as a business model).

Yes, I know that in the free software community there are leaders like Linus Torvald. What is different: they are chosen as leaders (free software teaches us a lesson about choice). And free software shows us that software developers are not motivated by money alone. They are motivated by a goal (the goal to create software which gives you freedom - the freedom to gain control about what you're doing). The existence of GNU/Linux assures us that my writings about motivation can't be totally wrong.

It is essential to notice that leaders are not bad per se. But some people are chosen leaders, and the majority (in companies) are not. If you are a project manager it is crucial to ask yourself: if the team had a choice of their leader, would it be me? If you answer no to this question, then ask yourself why wouldn't they choose me? What am I doing wrong? And if your answer is yes then ask yourself why you assume this. Can you justify being a leader aside from being put into the place by a decision maker who is not a member of the team?

I won't propose that all project managers should be chosen in a democratic process. This wouldn't work (at least: it would not work in a company, but it works in the free software community). I just want you to question your own role in the team to gain a better understanding of the people that are working for you and to improve your quality (or your qualification) as a project manager.
 

Back to the top
Previous chapter Back to the table of contents Next chapter
Confusius, he says: Most organizations don't work because of their rules, but in spite of their rules
Linux ® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Copyright: Volker Dittmar
Created: 1999-12-18, last modified: 2000-01-16